LanderKit

Templates written in French — fully translatable in minutes

The PAS formula (Problem – Agitate – Solve) applied to a landing page

Published on 25 July 2026 · 7 min read

Faced with a blank page, a proven structure beats inspiration. We've already covered the AIDA formula (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action); here is its most serious rival: PAS, for Problem, Agitate, Solve. The principle fits in one sentence: open with the visitor's problem (not your product), make that problem vivid and costly (the agitation), then present your offer as the way out. It's copywriters' favourite structure for emails and short sales pages, precisely because it's hard to get wrong.

Why leading with the problem works

PAS exploits a fundamental asymmetry in human decision-making: we are more sensitive to what we stand to lose than to what we might gain. That's prospect theory, from Kahneman and Tversky, published in 1979 in Econometrica — one of the most cited papers in all of behavioural economics — which showed that losses weigh psychologically heavier than equivalent gains (study on Google Scholar). Social psychology generalised the finding: the review by Rozin and Royzman published in 2001 in Personality and Social Psychology Review documents a systematic "negativity bias" — negative events capture more attention and weigh more in judgement than positive ones (study on Google Scholar). A page opening on "what you lose every month" therefore captures attention more reliably than one opening on "what we offer". PAS is simply that finding, turned into a format.

P — Name the problem, in the visitor's words

The first section must make the visitor say "that's exactly me". That means describing the problem in their words — the ones they'd type into Google, the ones they use on the phone — not in your solution vocabulary. "You chase your quotes three times and nobody replies" speaks to a tradesperson; "Optimise your sales pipeline" speaks to no one. It's the same principle as message match: the page must join the conversation the visitor is already having in their head. Concretely, the problem shows up in the headline itself or in the section immediately after the first screen.

A — Agitate: make the cost of the status quo concrete

Agitation is the step beginners skip — and the one that makes the difference. It's not about piling it on, but about making tangible what the problem already costs: time ("every quote redone by hand is an hour off the job site"), money, missed opportunities, mental energy. Three honest techniques: projection ("six months from now, same form, same chasing"), letting the visitor do the math ("how many leads lost this quarter?"), and the cascade (problem A creates problem B). Legitimate agitation stops where invention begins: no made-up statistics, no manufactured fears — only consequences the visitor recognises because they live them. That's the line between empathy and manipulation, the same one we draw for urgency and scarcity.

S — Solve: your offer as the natural way out

Arriving after a well-named problem and fair agitation, the solution no longer needs superlatives: it presents itself as the exit. This is where the classic landing page blocks take over — demonstration, benefits, social proof, guarantee, then the call to action. One phrasing detail matters: the solution must answer the agitated problem point for point. If the agitation talked about lost hours, the first benefit shown talks about recovered time — not "proprietary technology". The CTA itself can close the loop: "Stop chasing quotes by hand" turns the problem into an action, along the lines of our CTA examples.

PAS or AIDA: how to choose?

Choosing between PAS and AIDA by context
ContextRecommended structureWhy
The visitor suffers from an identified problem (leak, delay, overspend)PASThe problem is the natural entry point: naming it creates instant connection
The offer creates desire more than it repairs (a course, novelty, pleasure)AIDAThere's no sharp pain to agitate: you build interest, then desire
Short page, email, adPASThree beats, compact format, works even in a few lines
Long sales page for a high-commitment decisionAIDA (or extended PAS)Desire needs more room: demonstration, projection, proof

In practice the two structures combine: many good pages open in PAS (problem + agitation in the first third) then unroll the rest in AIDA. What matters isn't the acronym but the underlying order: the visitor first, the product second. A page that starts with "we" has already picked the wrong structure — whatever framework it claims. To see the mechanics in context, our anatomy of a landing page that converts shows where each PAS block slots into the full page, and LanderKit templates ship that skeleton ready to receive your problem, your agitation and your solution.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the PAS formula in copywriting?

PAS stands for Problem, Agitate, Solve: you open with the reader's problem phrased in their words, then make that problem concrete and costly (lost time, money, energy), then present the offer as the way out. It's one of the most used copywriting structures for short landing pages, emails and ads.

Is PAS more effective than AIDA?

Neither is superior in the absolute. PAS shines when the visitor suffers from an identified problem they're actively trying to solve; AIDA fits better when the offer creates desire rather than repairing a pain. Many effective pages combine both: a PAS opening, an AIDA development.

Isn't the agitation step manipulative?

It can become so, and that's the line to watch. Honest agitation makes tangible the consequences the visitor already lives — it articulates what they confusedly know. It becomes manipulation when it invents figures, manufactures fears or dramatises improbable risks. The simple rule: write nothing you couldn't stand behind in front of the customer in person.

Why open with the problem rather than the product?

Because human attention is asymmetric: Kahneman and Tversky's work on prospect theory (1979) and Rozin and Royzman's review of the negativity bias (2001) show that losses and negative signals weigh heavier than equivalent gains. A well-named problem captures attention and creates connection; a well-described product only speaks to those already convinced.

Read next

Related articles